Read e-book online Type Theory and Formal Proof: An Introduction PDF

By Professor Rob, Geuvers, Professor Herman Nederpelt

ISBN-10: 110703650X

ISBN-13: 9781107036505

Kind thought is a fast-evolving box on the crossroads of common sense, laptop technological know-how and arithmetic. This light step by step creation is perfect for graduate scholars and researchers who have to comprehend the bits and bobs of the mathematical equipment, the function of logical principles therein, the basic contribution of definitions and the decisive nature of well-structured proofs. The authors commence with untyped lambda calculus and continue to numerous primary style platforms, together with the well known and strong Calculus of buildings. The ebook additionally covers the essence of facts checking and evidence improvement, and using established style thought to formalise arithmetic. the single prerequisite is a easy wisdom of undergraduate arithmetic. rigorously selected examples illustrate the idea all through. every one bankruptcy ends with a precis of the content material, a few old context, feedback for additional interpreting and a variety of workouts to aid readers familiarise themselves with the cloth.

Show description

Read Online or Download Type Theory and Formal Proof: An Introduction PDF

Similar theory books

Global Positioning System: Theory and Practice by Prof. Dr. Bernhard Hofmann-Wellenhof, Dr. Herbert PDF

This publication indicates in accomplished demeanour how the worldwide Positioning approach (GPS) works. using GPS for particular measurements (i. e. , surveying) is taken care of in addition to navigation and angle decision. the elemental mathematical types for numerous modes of GPS operations and distinctive rationalization of the sensible use of GPS are constructed accurately during this publication.

Parosh Aziz Abdulla (auth.), Jan van Leeuwen, Anca Muscholl,'s SOFSEM 2010: Theory and Practice of Computer Science: 36th PDF

This publication constitutes the refereed court cases of the thirty sixth convention on present developments in thought and perform of desktop technological know-how, SOFSEM 2010, held in � pindleruv Mlýn, Czech Republic, in January 2009. The fifty three revised complete papers, awarded including eleven invited contributions, have been rigorously reviewed and chosen from 134 submissions.

New PDF release: Linguistic Theory and Complex Words: Nuuchahnulth Word

Nuuchahnulth is understood for its awesome use of word-formation and intricate inflection. this is often the 1st booklet to supply an in depth description of the complicated morphology of the language, in response to fabric accrued while it was once extra manageable than it truly is now. the outline is embedded inside of a broad-ranging theoretical dialogue of curiosity to all morphologists.

Extra info for Type Theory and Formal Proof: An Introduction

Sample text

Y x)z)v and z v is in β-nf. β zv (2) Define Ω := (λx . x x)(λx . x x). Then Ω is not in β-nf (the term itself is a redex) and does not reduce to a β-nf, since it β-reduces (only) to itself, and so one never gets rid of the redex. (3) Define Δ := λx . x x x. Then ΔΔ →β ΔΔΔ →β ΔΔΔΔ →β . .. Hence it follows that also ΔΔ does not reduce to a β-nf, since there are no other possibilities for one-step β-reduction than the ones given in the chain above. ) (4) Take Ω as above. Then (λu . v)Ω contains two redexes: the full term and the subterm Ω.

As a consequence of the above, it does not really matter which one to choose in a class of α-equivalent λ-terms: the results of manipulating such terms are always α-equivalent again. Therefore we take the liberty to consider a full class of α-equivalent λ-terms as one abstract λ-term. We can also express this as follows: we abstract from the names of the bound (and binding) variables, by treating α-equivalent terms as ‘equal’; that is to say, we consider λ-terms modulo α-equivalence. 2 From now on, we identify α-convertible λ-terms.

M ) ∈ Λ. Saying that this is an inductive definition of Λ means that (1), (2) and (3) are the only ways to construct elements of Λ. An alternative and shorter manner to define Λ is via abstract syntax (or a ‘grammar’): Λ = V |(ΛΛ)|(λV . Λ) One should read this as follows: following the symbol ‘=’ one finds three possible ways of constructing elements of Λ. These three possibilities are separated by the vertical bar ‘|’. For example, the second one is (ΛΛ), which means the juxtaposition of an element of Λ and an element of Λ, enclosed in parentheses, gives again an 6 Untyped lambda calculus element of Λ.

Download PDF sample

Type Theory and Formal Proof: An Introduction by Professor Rob, Geuvers, Professor Herman Nederpelt

by Donald

Rated 4.98 of 5 – based on 15 votes